Back to Chase
Home Page

Reviews compiled and written by Chase Ergonomics, Inc.
©1996 Chase Ergonomics, Inc.

Reproduction prohibited without express written permission from Chase Ergonomics, Inc.

 

Reviews of Articles

 

Can Abdominal Belt and/Or Intra-Abdominal Pressure Increase Spine Stabilty?

J. Cholewicki, K. Juluru, M.M. Panjabi, A Radebold, S.M. McGill

Department of Orthopaedics, Yale University School of Medicine,
New Haven, CT
Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada

 

 

Introduction: This study examined the effects of wearing an abdominal belt (elastic back support) and the rise in intra-abdominal pressure on the lumbar spine stability. Increase in lumbar pressure is hypothesized to increase lumbar spine stability.

Methods: Ten subjects in their mid-twenties to early thirties were placed in a jig in a semi-seated position. Hip motion was restricted while the upper torso remained free to move in any direction. They were instructed to pull on a cable which was held at one end by a chest harnesss attachment at the T9 level. The distal end of the cable was attached to a release mechanism by an electro-magnet. The subjects had a transducer introducer, to monitor IAP, introduced into their stomachs in the usual manner. IAP levels were monitored on an oscilloscope with readings in full view of the subjects. The subjects were shown the valsalva maneuver method of controlling IAP. When the IAP target level was reached, an operator released the electro-magnet, providing a "quick release" of the resistance. Quick releases were performed in conditions of trunk extension, trunk flexion and lateral bending (35% of maximum.) Trials were performed at 0%, 40% and 80% of the individual's maximum IAP in each direction. Only the 0% and 80% IAP trials were repeated while wearing a standard 10cm wide nylon belt (back support).

Results: Flexion trunk stiffness increased by 21% in the belt (back support) intervention at 0% IAP levels. During lateral bending, trunk stiffness increased by 30% at IAP levels of 80%. With no IAP, the trunk stiffness increased by 29% and 9% in flexion and lateral bending, respectively. The effects of IAP and belt (back support) conditions were additive in both directions. Combined effects of wearng an abdominal belt and the increased IAP level to 80% of maximum provided 83% and 86% more trunk stiffness in flexion and lateral bending respectively. Results in extension druing this study on trunk stiffenss lacked statistical significance.

Discussion: It is likely that increase in spine stability due to IAP was gained from the concomitant increase in muscle coactivations needed to generate IAP.

Trunk stiffening due to just the belt (back support) is likely a passive mechanism stemming from the wide and stiff belt placed between the rib case and pelvis. These findings are relevant to low back injury prevention and rehabilitation strategies. Increased spine stability may provide greater protection against injury following unexpected or sudden loading.

"The results indicated that both wearing an abdominal belt and increased IAP can each independently, or in combination, increase trunk stiffness, and therefore, increase lumbar spine stability under sudden loading conditions."

Proceedings of NACOB 98. The Third North American Congress on Biomechanics, Waterloo, Canada, August 14th- 18th, 1998.

 
Back to Chase
Home Page